Final Disciplinary Decisions | Greyhound Welfare & Integrity Commission

Greyhound Welfare & Integrity Commission

Rule 181 of the Greyhound Racing Rules outlines that GWIC must keep records of the disciplinary action it takes, and can publish records relating to disciplinary action at its discretion.

A full list of final disciplinary decisions can be found below.

Note: Participants are reminded that anyone dealing with or associating with a disqualified or warned off person for greyhound racing purposes may be in breach of the Greyhound Racing Rules and subject to disciplinary action.

Current persons under penalty

A full list of all current persons under penalty.

Current Interim Disciplinary Actions

A full list of all current persons facing interim disciplinary action.

Final Disciplinary Decisions

Showing page 1 of 80 pages.

Sort by

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

28th May 2026

Darren Wort Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 719.55 KB)

Detection prohibited substance
Greyhound: Benny Moko
Substance: Dexamethasone
Date: 4 February 2026, Temora

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

28th May 2026

Jade Lee Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 738.51 KB)

Participant did something which, in the opinion of the Controlling Body, constitutes an offence, by publishing contemptuous and improper language towards a Controlling Body.

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

27th May 2026

Tony Desira Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 718.87 KB)

Detection prohibited substance
Greyhound: Almighty Wrath
Substance: Cobalt
Date: 7 January 2026, Taree

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

25th May 2026

Barry Yates Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 767.69 KB)

Detection prohibited substance
Greyhound: Tenterfield
Substance: Caffeine and its metabolites Theophylline, Paraxanthine and Theobromine
Date: 23 January 2026, The Gardens

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

20th May 2026

Jamie Garay Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 693.46 KB)

Participant did something which, in the opinion of the Controlling Body, constitutes an offence, by retiring, without prior surgical sterilisation, a greyhound in his custody in circumstances not approved by the Controlling Body.

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

19th May 2026

Jay Opetaia Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 720.22 KB)

Detection prohibited substance
Greyhound: Light of Mine
Substance: Testosterone Propionate
Date: 24 January 2026, Wentworth Park

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

15th May 2026

Samantha-Jade Rathbone Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 275.22 KB)

Participant did something, which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by engaging in something that constitutes dishonest conduct.

Participant did something, which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by making a misleading statement in relation to an investigation.

Participant did something, which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by engaging in conduct deemed improper and insulting towards an employee of a controlling body.

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

13th May 2026

Dennis Lowe Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 233.1 KB)

Participant did something, which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by failing to adequately account for the whereabouts of a greyhound in his custody.

Participant did something, which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by retiring, without prior surgical sterilisation, a greyhound in his custody in circumstances not approved by the Controlling Body.

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

12th May 2026

Pierre Farrugia Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 252.99 KB)

Participant did something which, in the opinion of the Controlling Body, constitutes an offence, by engaging in conduct which constitutes misconduct.

Final Disciplinary Action Decision

12th May 2026

Nathan Allan Disciplinary Action Decision (PDF, 236.64 KB)

Participant did something, in which in the opinion of the Controlling Body constitutes an offence, by engaging in conduct that constitutes misconduct.

Participant published contemptuous and improper language towards an employee of a controlling body.